This year’s LFF presented the opportunity to see two significant
new UK features on the same day, and it was impossible not to notice a few
similarities. Jonathan Glazer's Under The
Skin and Richard Ayoade's The Double
are: both British; both independent releases that arrive courtesy of a
collaboration between the FilmFour production stable and the BFI; both attempts
to bring a modern sci-fi slant to a tried and tested story; both driven
entirely by a major Hollywood star in the lead role; and both playing in London
after being received with enthusiasm (at least by UK critics) at previous
festival appearances. Both also line up as contenders in the festival's
Official Competition (that's BFI speak for the best film award).
Glazer, best known for the excellent gangster drama Sexy Beast (2000), but inactive since
critical flop Birth (2004), moves
into completely new territory with Under
The Skin, a film subject to much industry chattering. Indeed, some
startlingly glowing dispatches from Venice and Toronto may have already placed
it in the unfortunate position of trying to live up to the hype. My screening
is completely sold out on a Monday lunchtime.
The story, based on Michel Faber's 2000 novel, concerns an
unidentified visitor (Scarlett Johansson) who drives around Scotland in a van,
seducing young men in the guise of a lost tourist before luring them to their death.
When not performing her damsel-in-distress routine, this abductress cruises in
silence showing barely a flicker of emotion. The film's opening scene, an
abstract piece straight out of 2001: A
Space Odyssey involving a gradually expanding white speck of light, some
intergalactic imagery and finally the inside of a human eye, concludes in an
all-white room with a nude Johansson removing clothes from the dead or dying body of a young lady, of similar appearance, and dressing herself in them. In short,
the film is fairly open in suggesting the character may not enjoy earthling
status.
An almost unrecognisable Johansson stalks the streets of Glasgow
dressed in an outfit that treads a fine line between iconic femme fatale and
hooker chic: jet black hair, fake fur, jeans and constantly re-applied red
lipstick. She also speaks with a very convincing English accent. It's all too
much for the passing hordes of randy Glaswegian boys, who think Christmas has
come early when this vampish beauty pulls over asking for directions, and aren't
afraid to assault her with the full force of Nuts magazine's best chat-up lines, though how the otherworldly
female is meant to be understanding them is anyone's guess. The whatever-she-is
engages each unsuspecting chap in small talk in order to ascertain that they
live alone - she seems interested only in victims who won't be missed.
This extra-terrestrial odyssey north of the border is captured on
locations around Glasgow and the Highlands. City streets are shot with an
impressive eye for modern detail, and the natural landscapes are photographed
to jaw-dropping perfection. When the film isn't out and about in Scotland, it
occasionally feels as if it is visiting a space-age art installation, similar to the one used
at its outset. This includes the temptress' chosen venue for finishing off her
prey - a Tardis-like place which looks like a run-down council house from the
outside, but becomes a void of darkness and creepy special effects inside. This
netherworld is soundtracked by a terrifying avant-garde noise. It feels as if
Johansson is picking the blokes up in Glasgow, then bumping them off somewhere
inside the Tate Modern.
So far, not bad. But the film's axis is an uncomfortable encounter
between the visitor and a disfigured man, another loner who waits until after
dark to go to the supermarket. It is not entirely clear whether
the-girl-with-no-name understands that the man is different to the others,
although she at least recognises that he is nervous and that she needs to
adjust her act a little in order to capture him. The man appears set to suffer the
same fate as the others but then walks free, apparently pardoned. Unfortunately,
with him go any further intentions one might have of staying with the film, as
the questions we are meant to be asking become apparent: Is the alien becoming
human? Could this have been caused by contact with human blood courtesy of a
passing flower-seller? Perhaps she was confused by the kindness of passers-by
when she tripped over in the street? But look... she's obviously not one of us
just yet if she can't wolf down that lovely bit of chocolate cake! Whatever the
reason is, our uninvited guest ceases to be a menace, and hunter becomes
hunted. Fans of the genre will recognise that this isn't exactly original stuff,
which wouldn’t be a problem were it not for the fact that this film really
wants to be ground-breaking.
This is where I began to feel a little uneasy, and not in the way
the film intends. The plot takes an unintentional turn for the silly just as
the central character, who may or may not be real to us but to everyone around
her is still a young woman, drifts into serious danger. I found the film had
lost credibility just as it was asking me to engage emotionally; I'm happy to
cheer on Johansson whilst she systematically relieves the world of sexist
yobbos, but I'm not inclined to worry about her once she becomes prey to more
sinister men because the dramatic devices that put her in that position were
too daft.
Under The Skin wants to be another Berberian
Sound Studio: an indie horror taking place in a setting that is part
real-world and part creation, with a non-linear narrative, aesthetically
pleasing effects and genuine scares. It achieves about half of that brief. The
film suffers from taking itself way too seriously; the second half in
particular drags on at a funereal pace and extends the running time to an
unnecessary 108 minutes. The film makers may have got carried away due to
having landed an A-lister for the lead role. If so, this is a shame because
Johansson is great in the part and it's interesting to watch her performing
outside her comfort zone. If Glazer had noticed that the basic premise of the
story is Species, his crew's artistry could have turned this into a thoroughly enjoyable alien
exploitation romp. Alas, I think there are some geeky designs on reinventing
science fiction weighing down a potentially fine film. A tedious Q&A that
followed my screening featured mostly technical talk, perhaps indicating with
which audience this film will find most favour.
A humour deficiency is not an affliction shared by The Double, Richard Ayoade's follow up
to the warmly-received Submarine.
That film established Ayoade as a director, though he is perhaps still best
known for his turn as Moss in The IT
Crowd. This time, the big-shot
found slumming it on a UK budget is Jesse Eisenberg. The Double is a dystopian black comedy set in a grim, totalitarian
no-man's-land that closely resembles the Orwellian hell that Terry Gilliam
envisaged in Brazil. Eisenberg plays
Simon James, a meek and socially hopeless office boy who works for a mysterious
organisation headed up by an unseen character known as 'The Colonel'. Simon is
so anonymous that the security guard he passes every day at work never
recognises him, and he can only dream of winning the affections of his dream
girl, Hannah (Mia Wasikowska), who works the company photocopier, one of many
enormous retro-futurist contraptions designed to make the film unplaceable in
terms of period.
One day, James Simon, an exact physical replica of Simon James
(so, Eisenberg again), shows up at the office and turns out to be everything
that Simon isn't. The new employee becomes instantly popular with everyone,
including Simon's bosses and would-be girlfriend, but Simon and James are
apparently the only two people who can see that they're identical twins. At
first the relationship between the doppelgängers is amicable; James coaches
Simon in improving his social skills and wooing the ladies, and Simon helps
James to get ahead at work. Eventually though, Simon realises he's being taken
for a ride, and that James is the only one benefiting from their friendship.
The penny also drops for Simon that the man he's spent his life wishing he
could be is actually a bit of an arse. Realising that there is something to be
said for his own qualities after all, but finding that it's too late to reverse
most of the damage, Simon starts to lose the plot.
The Double is based on a Dostoyevsky novella, updated via various other
familiar sources, and personalised by Ayoade with some absurdist British humour
and a touch of tweeness. However, the film shares with its protagonist a
frustrating habit of being too tentative. The personal identity theme feels at
times like it may go full-on Gregor Samsa, but instead of exploring further
into the darkness it retreats to a story of unrequited love at the office.
Simon’s employers, with their windowless offices, meaningless job titles and
‘Big Brother’ figure, suggest a huge impenetrable bureaucracy, but the script
isn’t prepared to walk any further down the path that leads to corporate power,
police states and political oppression. The doppelgänger brings to mind Blade Runner-style replicants, but they
aren't taking over the world; then we have the idea of an unhappy man longing
to reinvent himself as somebody more capable and desirable, offering up Fight Club as a touchstone, but there's
no deeper exploration of the male psyche here, and the cooler of the two
Eisenbergs is more Mark Zuckerberg than Tyler Duerden. Many good (if not new)
ideas are tried, but not developed. You get the feeling Ayoade might just be too
nice for this territory, yet even the film's cutesy streak goes unfulfilled -
Simon's quirky way of expressing his love for Hannah wouldn't have been out of
place in Amelie.
The film fares best in its first hour, when some terrific deadpan
gags and oddball characters support Eisenberg's classy turn in the twin lead
roles. Sally Hawkins' cameo as an unhelpful receptionist is a particular
scene-stealer. It is later when things runs into trouble: once the film has
established the situation between the lookalikes, it doesn't quite know how to
go about delivering a satisfying conclusion. However, this will not prevent
fans enjoying later cameos from Ayoade's former IT Crowd buddies Chris Morris and Chris O'Dowd.
Unlike Under The Skin, The
Double is aware of, indeed celebrates, its lack of originality, as many of the
references used are intentional homage. Whilst Glazer’s film is fun spoiled by a
desire to be considered serious art, Ayoade’s is a potentially profound film trivialized
by a strange combination of diffidence and archness. What Ayoade’s film shares
with Glazer’s is technical triumph, which probably explains the nods they’ve
received from the festival committee. I would argue in both cases that the
artistic flair and behind-the-scenes trickery don’t do enough to sustain films lacking
in narrative substance, but The Double at
least comes up short with a smile on its face.
Both Under The Skin and The Double will be on general release in
the UK in spring 2014.
Follow Jamie on Twitter


No comments:
Post a Comment