Pages

Wednesday, 13 November 2013

We Can Learn a Hell of a Lot From Artists, Scientists and Madmen: An Interview With John Higgs

John Higgs's book The KLF: Chaos, Magic and the Band That Burned A Million Pounds is probably the finest music biography of the year. Taking in such esoteric topics as Jungian psychology, conspiracy theories and the religion of Discordianism, the book attempts to interpret the band's often bizarre and deeply symbolic activities. Here, Mr Higgs talks to us about synchronicity, the legacy of the KLF, and his plans for the future.
                                        John Higgs: KLF biographer and benevolent space-god
1) What originally drew you to write about the KLF? And why at this particular time? 
The initial spark was Jim Reid’s article in The Observer about the money burning back in 1994. I had been aware of The KLF before that, but I hadn’t paid them a great deal of attention because I was a metal head and therefore not allowed to listen to dance music (those were the rules). But that account of the burning stuck in my craw and I clipped that article, which was the first time I had ever clipped an article from a newspaper. I’ve still got it. I might be meeting Jim Reid soon, so I might get him to sign it.
The burning has bugged me ever since. When something makes no sense I can’t digest it and move on, and the only way to work through it and flush it out of my system was to turn it into a book. And all the other people who should have stepped up and written the KLF book over the last couple of decades have studiously failed to do so, so eventually I had to accept that the job was falling to me.
As for why now - it all happened in a bit of a blur. I sat down to write a novel called The Brandy of the Damned and the next thing I knew I had written both Brandy and The KLF. I see them very much as sister books, with similar themes being explored in both fiction and non-fiction, so I’m always pleased when people read them together.
2) Were you ever tempted to approach Drummond and Cauty for their input?
That was original idea, but the book had other plans. Many journalists had asked Bill and Jimmy all the obvious questions about why they had done what they did, but the results were always lacking and unenlightening. That approach didn’t seem to get us anywhere, so another way was needed. And as the book progressed doing it without them seemed increasingly in the spirit of the thing. When you’re writing about people who would take huge chunks of Abba or The Beatles on a whim, to use for their own ends, trying to be official or asking nicely felt wrong.
I met Jimmy recently and he was such a nice guy that I’m glad I hadn’t spent time with him beforehand. It would have coloured what I wrote, and for the worse. I wouldn’t have casually referred to them as attention-seeking arseholes or fuckers if I knew how likeable they were.
I can’t think of many other stories that I would take the same approach with, but this one needed the totally independent view, I think. An official book would have a tone of “hey, remember us, we did all that stuff back in the day,” and that wouldn’t have had the same impact.
3) The KLF story is littered with highlights, from The JAMMs burning their records in a Swedish field to the Brit Awards and burning the million pounds on Jura; which bit was the most exciting to research and write about, for you?

That’s a tough question. It’s a rigorously edited book where anything that didn’t completely grab me was chucked out, as it had to start full-on and not let up. So I do love all the stories in there. I have a soft spot for the Brits performance, though, as the disconnect between what the band were going through and how the audience perceived them is so wide.


4) Your book is filled with strange coincidences, or synchronicities as Jung called them; In the Cosmic Trigger Trilogy, Robert Anton Wilson talks about how disconcerting synchronicities can become, when you start looking for them. What was the oddest coincidence / occurrence you came across when you were researching The KLF?
Hells Teeth, writing that book unleashed a shit storm of synchronicities… I wouldn’t know where to start. I suspect that’s part of the reason why my memory of writing it is such a blur now. I was tempted to call the book ‘Turn Into The Wave’ at one point, as that was what it felt like. Fortunately the ‘banishing ritual’ ending worked nicely and things have returned to their normal, manageable level of weird. For me at least. One of the great things about being a writer in the Twitter age is that it is easy for readers to tell me how the book is affecting them. I love getting those tweets. 
5) What do you think the legacy of The KLF is now? It seems like the music and art worlds are becoming more businesslike than ever - did they fail?
I’m not sure whether subjectively declaring that The KLF succeeded or failed is that important. The path they took was more interesting than the destination, or so it seems to me.
6) On a similar note, do you think it would be possible for a band to have that level of success / impact in today's record industry?
Oh completely, bands just need to reappraise what they are doing and why they are doing it. They’re unlucky because they’ve grown up in the X Factor era where the idea that you have to be serious and career-minded is constantly drummed into young musicians, to the extent that their relationship with their muse becomes a loveless marriage of convenience. Many successes are people who have fallen upwards rather than climbed their way up there, and the path of chaos can take you to the same place as the path of order, if you stop struggling and let it. You need to remain focused on creating something pure and thrilling and which makes people feel something they haven’t felt before, and the rest is just a leap of faith.
7) What are you working on next?

Ah – thanks for asking – I’m nearing the end of a long-gestating dream project of mine, an alternative history of the 20th century. I say ‘alternative’ as almost all 20th century histories are written by politicians or political journalists, and they tend to take the view that it was the politicians who were important in shaping that era. As a result they talk endlessly about the geo-political significance of Suez or the Bay of Pigs instead of getting to grips with relativity, modernism, chaos maths, psychedelics, quantum mechanics, postmodernism or the psychological impact of the Apollo programme. 

I take a different view, in that I don’t think we can learn a huge amount more from the politicians of the age, but we can learn a hell of a lot from the artists and scientists and madmen, and I think that approach can bring a new understanding about 21st century life and the modern networked age. That book won’t be in shops until 2015, I’m afraid, but look out for it as it’s shaping up nicely.

No comments:

Post a Comment