It all begins with a case of mistaken identity. Mr Defoe
hires Jude, fresh from St Andrews, to come to Sark and spend the summer
tutoring his son Pip, under the impression that she is male, and will hopefully
prove to be a good influence, helping to draw her rather diffident charge out
of himself. With the help of their young Polish-English cook, Sofi, this is
exactly what Jude proceeds to do, but not necessarily in the direction her
employer envisaged.
It quickly becomes apparent that the pupil outshines the
teacher. Instead of focussing on science and maths, as Mr Defore desired, Pip
and Jude decamp to the kitchen, Sofi’s domain, where their real learning
begins: ‘we asked one another questions. What ifs, and would you rathers. What
we were scared of, and where we wanted to be in ten years’. They are a curious
bunch; Pip is clearly intelligent, but terribly shy. He is awkward among the
boisterous males of his extended family, drawn instead to his mother Esme, an
almost unseen figure whose presence nevertheless inflects the whole narrative,
like a character from Pinter. Sofi is less educated (when Jude mentions
something about the road to Manderlay, she replies ‘I don’t like Robbie
Williams’), and doesn’t have the privileged social background of Jude or Pip,
but is a dynamic, vital figure, teaching Pip that ‘when you’re beautiful, and
do what you do with the confidence of the sun, no-one seems to mind’.
It is hard to see exactly what Jude brings to this party.
She lags behind Pip intellectually (struggling through Hemingway while he reads
Proust), and lacks Sofi’s force of personality. She is always acting against
instinct, repressing her urges and avoiding the natural expression of her
desires: ‘I wanted to touch, because that’s instinct, isn’t it, but I asked
what time the others would be back, and went to lay the table in the dining
room’. In terms of class, though, she bridges the gap between Sofi and Pip; in
the strange atmosphere of Sark, the last outcrop of Feudalism in Europe, the
three form a close bond. Rankin-Gee subtly demonstrates the growing intimacy
between them, evoking the glorious self-sufficiency of teenage relationships:
‘it was as if the light was shining in us, and only on us’.
As in Bonjour Tristesse, to which the novel has been
compared, the apparently idyllic atmosphere has a sense of loss at its core.
Although nothing is made explicit, Esme appears to have an eating disorder, and
her withdrawal from the everyday business of the household generates a sense of
anxiety amongst the others. Jude alludes to self-harm in her narrative, baring
herself to Sofi in the confines of their shared bed and breakfast room: ‘I came
back from the bathroom in a thin tank top and pants, rather than pyjamas. I
stood in the narrow alley between our beds, taking longer than necessary to set
the alarm on my phone, not wanting her to look, but not wanting her not to
see’…’your legs,’ she said’.
In the sheltered world of Sark the three are able to act on
impulse, and with relative impunity. As the group moves apart, and the three begin
to negotiate the adult world, it is Jude’s insecurity and inability to
act that becomes the dominant theme; their actions seem to be a pale reflection of
their aspirations. The second part of the novel takes on a cinematic structure;
the narrative splits, becoming episodic, a similar technique to the one
employed by Eleanor Catton in the closing stages of The Luminaries, though that
was on a grander scale. Rankin-Gee gives a sense of how depression can blur the
edges of memory – there is very little detail of what Sofi and Jude, in
particular, actually do as adults. The impression is that contrary to received
wisdom, the characters were fully formed, operating at their greatest
potential, during that summer in Sark. After that, they fragmented, became
shadows of their former selves.
Although the most obvious comparison in terms of tone would
be the previously mentioned Bonjour Tristesse, it is also worth mentioning The Last King of Scotland.
The title clearly brings Giles Foden’s novel to mind, and there is a similarity
in the idea of a young character arriving in a strange new environment and
acting witjout regard to consequences, before the realities of the adult world catch up
with them. There are also hints of Poliakoff in the interactions between Pip’s
real family and the surrogate relatives who enter his home. It would have been interesting to see Rankin-Gee explore the unique
characteristics of Sark further; we are given a sense of the island's
otherworldliness, but we are never really shown how its feudal legacy is
manifested, which feels like a missed opportunity. The sections based
on Sark are the strongest parts of the novel, and would actually have worked perfectly well as a self-contained novella, without the slightly perfunctory adult chapters. Later, Jude’s narrative becomes
frustrating, as the character’s listlessness begins to seep into the prose.
There are occasional gothic intimations of death, which are well-handled by the
author, but it is hard to remain connected to the character.
Ultimately, The Last Kings of Sark is a failry promising debut; Rankin-Gee skilfully mixes the youthful exuberance of the early stages with a hint of something darker underneath, and there is a cinematic feel to much of the novel, though a big screen audience might demand more closure than the author is willing to provide. The novel is let down slightly by an unevenness to the prose. There are sentences which demonstrate a poetic turn of phrase, but these are often followed by more pedestrian passages. Maybe some extra drafting could have bought more depth to the overall experience; the talent is definitely there, but isn't yet fully expressed. If you’re keen on bittersweet coming-of-age novels though, this is definitely worth a look.


No comments:
Post a Comment