Courttia Newland’s seventh novel, The Gospel According to
Cain, explores the relationship between a young man who seemingly has no past,
and a middle-aged woman who cannot escape from hers. Beverly Cottrell, the
narrator, had her comfortable life irrevocably derailed by the theft of her
baby from a parked car, whilst in the negligent care of its father. Two decades
on, a disturbing presence enters her life: Wills, a sullen, troubled young man
who claims to be her son. This confrontation is the starting point for an
emotionally raw discussion of identity and belonging.
Newland has written extensively for the stage, and the
set-up of this novel is reminiscent of the claustrophobic domestic
power-struggles found in Pinter’s plays. Whether he is her son or not, Wills is
a brooding, accusatory figure who takes up residence in Beverley’s home, his
presence immediately disturbing the balance of her relationships with friends,
neighbours and relatives.
Beverly is a socially ambiguous character. Wealthy enough
not to have to work, she runs an evening class in creative writing for at-risk
youths in her local area; although she forms a close, motherly bond with her
students, and is capable of inspiring them, her vocabulary and manner of speech
separates her from them. Likewise, she is not an entirely comfortable member of
the middle classes; at school, she felt poorer than her classmates, and she is
emotionally distant from her sister Jackie, an academic. Her psyche is mirrored
by her surroundings. She is close to the markets of Holland Park, where she can
browse the organic produce, ‘admiring the peacocks and rabbits’, but she has to
walk home through streets where she has heard ‘stories of people being shot for
asking the young not to smoke in a public place’.
Subconsciously, the guilt she feels at the loss of her son
seems to manifest itself as a deeper feeling of guilt at her ‘privilege’. In
her dreams, she returns to the slave colonies of nineteenth century Barbados,
where her family ‘sells products of slavery to plantation owners’. After the
reappearance of her ‘son’, who she knows has enjoyed none of the advantages she
could have provided for him, she begins to see these reminders in her waking
life too, in symbols like the logo of a rum bottle, ‘a tan table depicting dark
men, fields…’ In her class, she asks her kids to confront their past and the
society they inhabit, but she struggles to face up to the same questions in her
own life. As she becomes more emotionally committed to Wills, she senses that
she may be abandoning the kids who look up to her, further heightening this
sense of betrayal.
Wills is similarly complex. In a one-on-one situation with
Beverly, he is by turns sullen and needy, manipulating her and playing up her
hope of redemption – such is her desire to accept him, she rejects advice to
get a DNA test. In more social situations he struggles. His friend, Vicky,
tells Beverly that Wills has tried to make something of himself (‘he used to
put on events, like rap and poetry nights, positive stuff’), but feels as
trapped by the past as his ‘mother’ is: ‘he got into the Black shit… Panthers
an Malcolm an all that. Trouble with Black shit is once you got the knowledge
you gotta deal wiv the fact you can’t leave’.
Language plays an important role in the novel. While Beverly
and the kids from her class have a very different manner of speech, there are
efforts on both sides to bridge the gap; the kids open up emotionally, while
Beverly playfully uses street slang from time to time. However, the divisive
qualities of discourse are illustrated in the confrontation between Wills and
Beverly’s family. Her sister Jackie, and brother-in-law Frank, come to the flat
while she is out, trying to cow Wills with their academic language and
passive-aggressive psychologising. Lacking the tools to fight back on their
terms, Wills reverts to the language of the streets. Neither side understanding
the conventions of what is being expressed, the argument flares out of control:
‘Wills did say he’d slap her, he admitted, but it was an idle threat. Frank
jumped up and tried to manhandle him, perhaps in an attempt to defend his
wife’s honour. Wills went into the kitchen, got the big knife, and emerged,
pointing it at them. They got up pretty damn quick after that’. His sense of latent violence is picked up by the kids Beverly teaches,
who instantly distrust him: ‘you shouldn’t let strange youts in yuh gates,
miss… Man’s dodgy’.
As Wills’ presence in Beverly’s life threatens to become
permanent, she experiences a loss of agency. While she is self-supporting, and
has the economic means to manage her life as she sees fit, her decisions are
questioned by those around her, from the counsellor she sees for her anxiety to
her family and even her students, who all feel a sense of ownership over her.
At the novel’s climax, a series of violent confrontations occur in her own
home, in which the participants disregard her presence entirely. It is clear
that this black woman’s life is seen as community property, and she is not seen
as being capable of acting in her own best interests.
There are flaws in The Gospel According to Cane; for an
epistolary novel, there are a few too many literary flourishes, as Beverly
meditates on the act of writing itself, and intersperses her narrative with
dictionary definitions of pain. Also, while the author can’t be blamed for
this, I feel the book is very poorly served by its cover and accompanying
blurb, which give the impression that this is a bog-standard piece of
misery-lit rather than the visceral exploration of race, identity and power
contained within. If I hadn’t known the author’s name I certainly wouldn’t have
considered reading it based on first impressions, which would have been a huge
shame.
These issues are outweighed by the book’s strengths though;
the characterisation is extremely strong, and the narrative has a powerfully
dramatic arc. Newland resists easy conclusions, and balances complex themes
skilfully without a sense that the action is being manipulated by a need to
make points. The momentum of the story means this is a novel to be read quickly
and reflected on at length; as with Pinter, there is an unsettling quality to
the novel that lingers in the memory.


No comments:
Post a Comment