'Our plan is to look at what was genuinely new, unexpected and radical. We are not concerned by the fallout from those ideas, so take it as read that everywhere we visit caused scandal, anger and furious denouncements by the status quo'
Compared to the grand narratives of conventional history books, dominated by wars, revolutions and discoveries, the history of ideas can be deeply challenging. If we were asked to explain the defining moments of the twentieth century, most of us could manage to put together a timeline of the World Wars, Great Depression, Cold War and the fall of the Berlin Wall. But what about the ideas that defined the century? This account would have to take in the work of Einstein, Freud, James Joyce, Ayn Rand, Sartre, Jung, Timothy Leary, postmodernism, chaos theory, quantum mechanics and more. This raises an unsettling question: how much do we understand the ideas which shape our world? In Stranger Than We Can Imagine, John Higgs acts as a guide to the ‘dark woods’ of history. Here, you will read more about Super Mario than Joseph Stalin, and more about Modernism than monetarism; we will see the links between the artistic and scientific breakthroughs which defined Twentieth Century thought, and discover hidden details which lie behind some of humanity’s great achievements.
Higgs characterises the twentieth century as a period in
which conventional theories were confounded, when people were presented with
bewildering, often incomprehensible new explanations of how the world worked. The
central pillars of our worldview – Newtonian physics, empire, our place in the
universe – were overturned. Higgs lines up nineteenth century experts who
assured the public that there was nothing new to be discovered in physics or
astronomy, to show us just how intellectually jarring the twentieth century was,
and also to demontstrate that our own inevitabilities can and will change. The book’s title
comes from the astrophysicist Sir Arthur Eddington, who described the universe
as not just 'stranger than we imagine, it was stranger than we can imagine' -
as many twentieth century developments were beyond the range of what could
possibly be imagined at the end of the nineteenth.
Stranger Than We Can Imagine begins with a visit to the
Gaugin retrospective at the Tate Modern in 2010. Higgs recalls the jarring
effect of moving from a room filled with the light and innocence of his work to
the 'alien landscapes, incomprehensible structures and troubled dreams' of
Dali, Picasso and Max Ernst which dominated the gallery’s twentieth century
collection. The question for Higgs is, ‘what the hell happened, at the
beginning of the twentieth century, to the human psyche’? To answer this
question, we have to look at the political, scientific and artistic ideas which
transformed a world of certainties into one of doubt and chaos.
In The Cosmic Trigger Trilogy, Robert Anton Wilson talks
about the speed at which the level of knowledge available to humanity doubles.
According to his calculations, it took 1500 years for the level of human
knowledge to double from the level available in 1AD (the Elizabethan mystic
Francis Bacon is considered to be the last human who knew everything; the last
person to know all mathematics was Alexander Ostrowski, who died in 1915). The
rate of growth is exponential, so by the mid twentieth century, the sum total of
human knowledge was doubled in the space of a decade. Not even the most learned
expert can hope to keep up with such rapid shifts, so no wonder the world can
seem a confusing and often scary place.
The theme which runs through Stranger Than We Can Imagine is
the realisation of the relationship between observer and observed, and the
consequent move away from the idea of a single, fixed viewpoint. From here, we
move onto the failure of Bertrand Russell’s attempt to impose a logical set of
rules on mathematics, which foundered in 1930 with Godel's Incompleteness
Theorum. As Higgs notes, already 'common sense and certainty were not faring
well in the twentieth century'. Quantum mechanics comes next, at which point
even the experts were beginning to feel disorientated. Schrodinger said 'I do
not like [quantum mechanics] and I am sorry I ever had anything to do with it',
whilst the Nobel Prize winning physicist Richard Feynman summed up the general confusion when he admitted 'I think I can
safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics'.
The move away from the idea of a single, objective reality
influenced the rise of the individual, which Higgs explores through the lives
of Ayn Rand, Alistair Crowley and The Rolling Stones, as well as the
development of modern Paganism as a form of spiritualism which privileged
personal experience. This increased sense of personal agency and responsibility
influenced everything from politics to art, and the rise of the ‘hero’ as
portrayed in Hollywood films.
Higgs is excellent at identifying the quirks which often
drove the innovators of the twentieth century. For example, there is the discomforting
oddness of the pioneers of the space race – from Marvel Parsons, the inventor
of jet assisted take-off, a Crowley devotee who chanted black magick
invocations before rocket tests, to Werner von Braun, whose career trajectory
involved a 'journey from the SS to the Disney Channel'.
Appropriately for a work which has to take into account the postmodernist movement, Higgs fuses high and low culture with a clear understanding of the achievements and limitations of both. Early on, he argues that there is a common thread between Ulysses and Grand Theft Auto V, in that both were meant to serve as complete, immersive recreations of a particular city. Later, he is able to provide a path through the knotty undergrowth of postmodernist theory by using the example of Super Mario Brothers: 'a combination of elements that don't fit together under any system of categorisation, other than the game's own logic… a collision of unrelated forms that are put together and expected to work on their own terms'. This feeds back into the concept of individualism: 'the idea that an outside opinion or authority can declare that some elements belong together while others don't has been firmly rejected'. The user affects the game being played by their decisions, creating a feedback loop in which we see the observer affecting what is observed once more.
Appropriately for a work which has to take into account the postmodernist movement, Higgs fuses high and low culture with a clear understanding of the achievements and limitations of both. Early on, he argues that there is a common thread between Ulysses and Grand Theft Auto V, in that both were meant to serve as complete, immersive recreations of a particular city. Later, he is able to provide a path through the knotty undergrowth of postmodernist theory by using the example of Super Mario Brothers: 'a combination of elements that don't fit together under any system of categorisation, other than the game's own logic… a collision of unrelated forms that are put together and expected to work on their own terms'. This feeds back into the concept of individualism: 'the idea that an outside opinion or authority can declare that some elements belong together while others don't has been firmly rejected'. The user affects the game being played by their decisions, creating a feedback loop in which we see the observer affecting what is observed once more.
If Stranger Than We Can Imagine presents the twentieth
century as a confusing landscape, the territory of the id, it does also hold
out some hope for the future. The rise of social networking causes problems for
believers in hierarchical structures, who struggle to control it and fear
transparency, and libertarians, who fear scrutiny. After the wild uncertainties
of the previous century, early twenty-first century thinkers crave certainty,
an objective view of reality rather than a multi-perspective viewpoint. This
belief system is under pressure from a new generation of digital natives, and
it is the synthesis between these two contrasting world-views which will come
to dominate the next hundred years. This might not be such a bad thing. As
Higgs says, 'the digital native generation do not see themselves using just the
straightjacket of individualism. They know that model is too limited. They are
more than isolated selves. Seeing themselves differently will cause them to act
differently. Those of us born before the 1990s should, perhaps, get out of
their way and wish them luck'
***


No comments:
Post a Comment